Starting-firm marketing needs an order of operations. The playbook below turns the first twelve weeks into acceptance gates: establish ownership, make the public promise accurate, prove the inquiry path, introduce the practice, then run one focused acquisition cycle.
The schedule is illustrative. The firm’s licensing, practice, market, assets, and review obligations control the real launch.
Week 1: approve the launch brief
Write one page with practice focus, intended clients, market, exclusions, evidence, launch date, cash limit, weekly attorney time, intake capacity, first acquisition question, and decision rights.
Gate: the owner, practice reviewer, and intake owner can explain the same service and next step.
Weeks 1–2: secure ownership
Inventory domain, DNS, email, website, profiles, analytics, call tracking, advertising, CRM, creative, and source files. Record owner, administrator, recovery method, vendor access, renewal, export, and exit.
Gate: the firm can access critical accounts without a former employee or vendor and knows what it can export.
Weeks 2–4: launch the minimum public presence
Publish only claims the firm can substantiate. The core experience should state who the firm helps, which work and market it serves, who the lawyer is, why the evidence matters, how to inquire, and what happens next.
Test on mobile. Confirm accurate name, contact information, hours, service, and operating locations. Follow current platform and professional rules.
Gate: five cold readers can identify service, market, attorney, contact path, and next step; every material claim has a source.
Weeks 3–4: prove the inquiry path
Create one owned queue. Define eligible distinct inquiry, contact, preliminary qualification, attorney review, signed agreement, and opened matter. Set owners and escalation.
Test calls, forms, after-hours, duplicate identity, uncertain service, owner absence, and failed delivery.
Gate: every test reaches the correct record and accepted owner, and every failure becomes visible.
Weeks 4–6: introduce the firm deliberately
Create three useful introduction versions:
- one sentence for former professional contacts;
- a short note for likely referral partners; and
- a fuller explanation with one genuinely useful resource.
A fictional example: “I opened Mesa Commercial Counsel to help Arizona owner-led companies handle recurring contracts and outside-general-counsel needs. We do not handle contested litigation. This two-page vendor-agreement issue list may be useful to your clients; if a request is unclear, send it to me for review.”
No message was sent. The example works because it says what the firm does, what it does not, and why the recipient might care.
Gate: the attorney can name 20 relevant people and a useful reason to contact each group without mass solicitation.
Weeks 5–7: build a question bank and one cornerstone resource
Capture consultation, intake, client, and referral questions. Choose one that matters to the desired work. Add attorney insight, a worked example, decision steps, and a next action.
Gate: the resource reduces a real uncertainty and can be sent to a person without apologizing for its thinness.
Weeks 7–9: choose one acquisition test
Compare search demand, relationship distribution, paid feasibility, local eligibility, creation capacity, and measurement. Give the test one channel, one service, one market, one loss limit, and one question.
Example: “Test whether paid search can generate attorney-reviewed contract matters in Maricopa County without exceeding $6,000 total exposure or four additional consultations per week.” Figures are illustrative.
Gate: landing, intake, source tracking, budget, stop rule, and capacity are ready before launch.
Weeks 9–12: run and review the first cycle
Maintain a change log. Review delivery and broken paths frequently; review business outcomes by mature inquiry cohort. Show pending and unknown records.
Use a decision table:
Scroll sideways to review every column.Each row is shown as a labeled card.
| Decision | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Scale | Useful outcomes, understood economics, reliable intake, available capacity |
| Hold | Operation works but cohort needs time or volume |
| Repair | A fixable page, route, data, message, or capacity defect obscures the result |
| Stop/redesign | Loss limit reached, wrong work persists, or test cannot answer its question |
Gate: the owner records the next dollar, owner, guardrail, and review date.
Keep a one-page launch control board
Scroll sideways to review every column.Each row is shown as a labeled card.
| Workstream | Artifact | Owner | Acceptance evidence | Current risk | Next decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Launch brief | Founder | Approved focus/exclusions | Too broad | Narrow page |
| Presence | Site/profile inventory | Operations | Mobile and claim test | Old phone | Repair |
| Intake | Test log | Intake owner | Accepted owners | After-hours gap | Add cover |
| Relationships | Introduction list | Founder | Conversations scheduled | Generic message | Add resource |
| Acquisition | Test charter | Marketing | Loss/capacity gates | Sparse data | Hold |
Update the board weekly. It should reveal the constraint rather than celebrate completed tasks.
What this playbook leaves for later
Complex channel portfolios, large content programs, multiple offices, sophisticated automation, and full attribution can wait until the first system works. The complete strategy is covered in JD-107; this piece owns launch sequence and acceptance.
Juris Digital’s current JurisPage service path is relevant when a new firm needs its public presence and first marketing cycle coordinated. Bring the launch brief, ownership inventory, target date, budget limit, and intake test. Ask the proposal to identify the current work, timing, fees, ownership, and acceptance evidence; do not rely on historic package language.
Last updated:
