2017 has been the year of changes for Local SEO’s. There has been more product modifications and major additions (upgrades?) than I can remember happening in a single year.
One of the new features we have seen rolling out (or just being tested) a lot over the past week is visible review summaries showing up in the three pack and local finder. You can see an example of what I’m talking about highlighted in red below on the third local pack result on the Desktop example and on the first result in local.
Another example of review summaries in search results
You will notice that personal injury is highlighted in the example above. This is interesting as the search I conducted was for “Car Accident Lawyer” and I assumed they might highlight the keyword I typed.
I noticed that these reviews are not popping up in every market. In fact, I still see very few overall when I’m searching for them. You can also see these triggered in the local finder as you can see in the example below:
In the examples that I have seen, I did not notice an immediate pattern as to why they are picking certain reviews over others. A quick glance showed me that some were pulled from most recent reviews and others seemed to have no identifying factors such. It appears to be algorithmic as to why they pick the reviews they do and how they truncate them.
This also still seems to be a bit of an unknown. After looking at a small sample set of attorneys (15) the only thing we noticed is that reviews were in the double digits in these cases. However, there are plenty of firms with 10+ reviews that do not generate the review samples at this time.
From a user experience, I thought it would be cool if this feature showed the picture of the actual reviewer instead of just the blue graphic headshot. On the examples we checked we saw that many reviewers had actual pictures in their review profile and they are not pulling to the shortened review summaries. I don’t think this will change, but it reminded me a bit about the old Google Authorship photos in search results and got me excited.
Right now this seems more like a test than a full rollout and there seems that there is more we don’t know about this test than what we do.
If you’re able to get a screenshot example with a search phrase we would love to see it! (We prefer lawyer results). Please send it to cmeraz (at) jurisdigital.com
As a law firm marketing agency, we write our blog articles primarily with lawyers in mind.
Today, we address a topic that you might expect attorneys to already know about, but it’s one that is nevertheless getting a lot of law firms in trouble.
It’s also a topic that applies to everyone in every field, so even if you’re a non-lawyer who’s never stepped foot in a firm, this one’s still for you.
The question at hand: copyright, images, and when you can (or can’t) use someone else’s photograph or graphic design in your own work.
One of our clients, an excellent law firm with a sterling reputation, recently got in trouble for using an image they didn’t own in their firm’s newsletter. Like a lot of people, they had an urgent need for a relevant photograph and ran a quick Google Image search to save the day.
Google Images is a godsend to a generation that craves, expects, and demands visual aid. (And because we’re an attorney SEO agency, we’ll also nod toward the marketing benefits we can get for our law firm clients by using Google Image SEO strategy the right way.)
But with convenience comes temptation. It’s all too easy to find the perfect image in under ten seconds, right click that bad boy, and drop it into your newsletter / blog article / what have you.
Today, we’re going to take a simple look at the bright-line copyright rules surrounding internet images… and we’ll also throw in some practical, “non-binding,” experience-based advice about when your Google Image search is more or less likely to catch flak from somebody with a copyright claim.
We work with lawyers every single day, but we are not ourselves esquires. The irony of writing about a legal issue to legal experts isn’t lost on us. But marketing for lawyers is our specialty, and it’s in that context — marketing publications — that law firms most frequently run afoul of the copyright rules.
Here’s how and why:
In general, before we dive into the specific context of using legal images from the ’net in law firm website and newsletters, it’s helpful to review some of the foundational tenets of copyright law as it relates to fair use and images:
Copyright
Fair Use
“Does this qualify as fair use?” It must be one of the most-asked questions of the digital age. And perhaps we’ll someday get a clearer answer to that question. But for now, courts are the only ones who can ultimately decide. In assessing fair use, judges weigh several factors on balance:
These four factors are set forth in 17 USC § 107, home of U.S. Copyright Law. Notable, a court must consider all the factors in tandem, but the first is often given the most weight.
It goes without saying that if you own the image yourself — because you’re the photographer or it was work for hire — or you’ve purchased a license to use the image, you’re in the clear.
Likewise, you’re good to go if:
But what if you definitely don’t own the image and don’t have clear permission to use it? Your next question becomes whether it qualifies as Fair Use. That question gets complicated when it comes to using legal images in law firm publications. Here’s why:
As you can see, fair use questions usually fall in a gray area. As a law firm engaged in commercial publication, you want to have a really strong first-factor case to overcome your shortcomings on the other three fair use factors.
A certain ethics system has evolved — and is still evolving — around the use of images in social media, and the law hasn’t quite caught up. Case in point: memes, which are arguably fair-use transformative works. See also: images that were seemingly posted on social media for the very purpose of being seen and used by the public.
Based on our experience, we think you’re less likely to get stung by a copyright infringement complaint in the following scenarios, even if they don’t quite qualify as ownership or fair use:
In both these cases, only use internet images if you’re comfortable doing so — at your own risk.
Above all else, remember these three rules:
Avoiding copyright infringement is especially important for law firms. Like anyone else, you don’t want to get sued. But you also have another important consideration: your reputation as practitioners of a noble profession.
Getting busted for stealing a photograph can be a professional embarrassment and could even lead to ethical problems with your state bar. That’s why it’s important to err on the side of caution.
As a law firm marketing agency, we often handle our clients’ graphic and image needs for them. Our clients trust us to keep them out of trouble — not only for images but also with copywriting. (As many law firms have learned the hard way, if you hire cheap writers with no legal background to do your blogging for you, you’ll likely end up with plagiarized work!)
We care about our clients’ content because content makes them grow. And that’s literally the only reason Juris Digital exists: to make law firms grow.
Need some help growing your firm using the internet the right way? Contact Juris Digital and find out what we can do for you today.
Pay-Per-Click all comes down to how much you pay per click — and whether it’s getting you what you want.
At Juris Digital, we’re consistently getting our clients more than double the average PPC conversion rate for law firms without breaking their budgets.
In fact, for one of our clients, we recently beat that average conversion rate more than seven times over. In today’s case study, we’re going to put that law firm in the spotlight to show you exactly how we achieved sevenfold success.
But first, a word on what we’re up against.
PPC advertising is an enormous industry. Google rakes in over $75 billion from AdWords alone each year, which means our law firm PPC clients are competing against some fat wallets.
That’s especially true in the legal services market. Keywords and phrases relevant to attorneys — and especially to personal injury attorneys — rank as the costliest terms in all of online advertising. (The most expensive keyword in the whole world: “Insurance.”)
And that’s just in AdWords. There are plenty of other PPC platforms that can produce big results for law firms too, chief among them: Facebook and Yahoo! Bing.
But outside of Big Law, few firms have wallets thick enough to outspend their biggest competitors. Bidding on PPC for lawyers can get out of control quickly, and smaller or mid-sized firms can easily bid themselves beyond the point of diminishing returns if they aren’t careful.
So if your dollars can’t be bigger, they need to be smarter, and that’s where PPC strategy comes in.
In the sections that follow, you’ll get a glimpse of one of our real clients, Malman Law, and their PPC goals. We’ll walk you through the custom-developed strategies we used to get them the growth they wanted for their firm, complete with graphs and easy-to-understand explanations.
We think Malman’s story is a compelling illustration for any firm wanting to get better PPC conversion rates than its competitors without breaking the bank.
The Law Offices of Malman Law, PC is a Chicago personal injury law firm with 11 associate and senior associate attorneys alongside president and founder Steven J. Malman. The firm handles everything from auto accidents and worker’s compensation claims to slip and fall, nursing home abuse, medical malpractice, and beyond.
Since opening in 1994, Malman Law has handled over 15,000 cases and has a slew of successful settlements and verdicts to its credit — including several over $5 million each.
Still, despite its success, Malman knows well the scope of competition in the Chicago market. As in every major city — and many of the smaller ones — there are more attorneys than the market really needs, and they’re all battling it out for the same four PPC slots at the top of the Google results page.
But as much as they want to win the race, Malman knows it can’t focus on PPC alone. Attorney web marketing is a multi-faceted exercise, and it includes many other services: inbound content marketing, social media, SEO, web design, local search marketing, and more. The firm has other advertising interests, too — television, billboard ads, outbound print marketing, etc.
So while they are able to devote an effective budget to online advertising, Malman wants to make sure they aren’t spending a single penny on law firm PPC that could be better allocated elsewhere.
In other words, PPC for lawyers it’s all about conversion. At the end of the day, even if you spend enough to claim those coveted spots at the top of Google, and even if your ads are good enough to get clicks, if those clicks don’t become clients, it was all for naught — and a relative waste of finite dollars.
So Malman asked our team here at Juris Digital to find out what other law firms are getting in terms of a conversion rate for PPC… and to make theirs better.
As it happens, our results were pretty stellar, so let’s get right to them:
The average conversion rate in PPC for lawyers is 4%.
Malman’s conversion rate after hiring Juris Digital: over 30%.
And we aren’t just talking about a one-time spike to 30%. Malman Law’s conversion rate and performance metrics have remained steady — and by steady, we mean more than seven times the law firm average — during the entire time that we have managed their account.
30% is a substantial benchmark, and it compares favorably in any industry. That means nearly 1 out of every 3 people clicking their ad goes on to contact their firm.
What would that kind of PPC conversion rate do for your practice?
So much of a successful attorney PPC campaign comes down to two kinds of word choice:
Because legal terms are some of the costliest in all of PPC, picking the right terms is critical. It’s a value game: which terms will get results for this specific firm in this specific market without spending more than they’re worth?
To find out, we conducted extensive keyword research. Which terms go for the most money? Which relevant key terms and phrases work best? What are their competitors in the market currently paying for?
Armed with that info, we started to bid competitively on “best opportunity” terms for Malman — and started winning the auctions we wanted.
But CPC is only half the equation (literally).
Generally speaking, Google’s formula for serving PPC ads to users looks like this:
CPC Bid x Quality Score = Ad Rank
At Juris Digital, we like to think we run quality PPC campaigns for lawyers, so we pride ourselves on high Quality Scores… and that takes us to Step 2.
Google is absolutely obsessed with getting its users the best, most relevant content possible. That goal drives everything the company does. It’s why organic SEO matters so much for turning up on Page 1 of their results. It’s why keyword stuffing doesn’t work anymore. And it’s the reason their PPC slots don’t simply go to the highest bidder.
In fact, an advertiser with a sky-high quality score can win a Google ad auction with a smaller CPC bid. So what is a Quality Score and how do we boost it?
A number of factors influence your ad’s Quality Score, including:
No one knows exactly how much weight Google assigns to each factor, but through careful (read: fanatical) monitoring, we were able to fine-tune Malman’s ads so that they earned optimal Quality Scores for each targeted key term.
This is where our expert copywriting comes in. By choosing words that work — both for the ad itself and for its landing page — we’re able to give Google the gold-standard relevance it’s looking for.
To some extent, this is a “chicken and the egg” proposition. As Quality Scores improved, Malman’s Ad Ranks continued to rise. This, in turn, improved click-through rate, which would then lead to an even higher Quality Score.
It’s easy to get caught up in that cycle and lose sight of anything that isn’t AdWords. But the truth is that while Google’s service is still leader of the pack, there are many other sophisticated PPC platforms out there that can drive substantial and highly relevant traffic to a law firm online. We wanted to make sure Malman wouldn’t miss out on those opportunities.
PPC platforms aren’t created equal, though, and what makes sense for one firm might not for another. LinkedIn’s PPC program, for instance, works well for business and transactional attorneys. Not so much for personal injury lawyers, who will generally get more bang for their bucks at Google, Facebook, Yahoo! Bing, and YouTube. So that’s where we concentrated our energy.
So far, we’ve talked a lot about what we did for Malman, but in reality, we do all of this with Malman, and that’s a key ingredient for success.
PPC is a significant investment for any law firm. The client needs to know its dollars are going to good use. They expect us to be good stewards of their investment and to produce a sizeable, demonstrable return.
Managing PPC for lawyers is unique in that our clients are some of the busiest working professionals out there. So while Mr. Malman and his attorneys don’t have time to pour over every little metric in our data, they do expect us to.
They also expect us to explain our findings in a way they can clearly visualize and confirm.
We want to bring a good report card to our clients — honest and transparent but also evident of real success. That’s why we work hard to optimize CPC and Quality Scores. We don’t sign our clients to long-term contracts, so if we don’t show results, we wouldn’t expect Malman to continue with our services.
A more than sevenfold improvement over the average attorney PPC conversion rate? Yeah, that’s a pretty stellar report card. And we’re producing that same level of success from month to month and from quarter to quarter.
How Did We Do It? Step 5: Great Site Content & Web Design
Earlier, we talked about optimizing the copy on Malman’s landing pages so that users who click their ads are taken to useful and relevant destinations.
But if they’re going to convert into clients (and remember: conversion is what it’s all about… that’s the ultimate goal, and it’s the metric we successfully multiplied over the industry average for Malman), they are almost certainly going to venture beyond that first landing page.
So the rest of the site has to look great, read well, and perform masterfully too.
Studies of web user behavior show that most people have very little patience for a sloppy or slow-loading site. And when it comes to professional service providers, like attorneys, they expect a really Grade-A website. Anything less raises real questions in the user’s mind about the law firm’s credibility. (A halfway decent law firm should be “with it” enough, and should have budget enough, to maintain a great website… or so the reasoning goes.)
Our law firm web design team here at Juris Digital designed Malman Law’s website using WordPress, the #1, top-rated, most widely used Content Management System (CMS) in attorney web design. We invite you to visit and take a look.
You’ll find:
The ads drive users to the website, but the site is what makes the sale. It’s Malman’s single most important conversion tool, and it’s the secret to the killer results we deliver them.
We realize that our results for Malman are pretty extraordinary, especially given how quickly we got there and how consistently we’ve stayed there.
But we were also reminded throughout this campaign that an all-in commitment to making our digital marketing efforts a success (and having a client who is willing to make that commitment with us) can make all the difference.
We understand that every law firm is different, and yours might not be ready to embrace PPC with arms as widely opened as Malman’s were, but we’ve also worked with enough law firms over the years to know that diligence and strategy will translate to ROI.
If there’s been a consistent lesson to come out of working with all our clients, it is this: committing to excellence always works.
If you haven’t seen the level of success you’d like in your past PPC campaigns, we can help. Our team is passionate about making your website and your web marketing efforts the law firm growth tools they ought to be. Contact Juris Digital today for law firm PPC management services.
A Review of Justia’s Web Design and Digital Marketing Services
If you’re in the market for digital marketing services for your law firm, it’s quite possible that you’ve come across Justia. Justia offers legal marketing services including web design, SEO, content marketing, and social media. These services supplement their lawyer directory on which they sell “Premium” listings.
In this article I’ve done by best to provide valuable insight into Justia’s marketing services. The goal is to help you make the most informed decision possible as you consider hiring Justia to handle your firm’s web design and digital marketing.
Disclaimer: Justia is a competitor of ours, and so we are hopelessly biased. That being said, what follows is my honest assessment based on what I know of their marketing services and results.
Before I examine Justia’s specific marketing services, I think it’ll be useful to have a look at the company’s history.
Justia was co-founded Tim Stanley (current CEO) and Stacy Stern (current President). The duo launched Justia.com not long after their previous company, FindLaw, was acquired by West Publishing (Thomson Reuters) in January 2001.
Justia.com appears to have been launched in November of 2002. However, at that point the site was was little more than pre-LinkedIn LinkedIn profile for Tim Stanley. Check out what the site looked like on the WayBack Machine.
By late 2004, Justia.com was advertising law firm website design and SEO services on a “coming soon” page, and the full site appears to have been launched on December 13, 2004. So, at the time of writing this post, Justia has been providing legal marketing services, including website design and SEO, for 12 years and 9 months. Props to Justia!
Justia.com has evolved since this first version was launched back in 2004. Most law firms are familiar with Justia.com because of it’s comprehensive lawyer directory, legal Q&A, and legal research resources. For our purposes here, we’ll keep our focus on reviewing Justia’s web design, content marketing and blogging, and SEO services.
One of Justia’s core services for law firms is website design and development. As I’ve said before, much of judging the quality of a given agency’s website design services comes down to preferential, subjective measures.
In the case of Justia’s contemporary websites, my personal opinion on their overall design is that it’s not particularly unique, diverse, or compelling, but it’s by no means bad or ineffective. Here are some examples:
[one_half][/one_half][one_half_last]
[/one_half_last]
[one_half][/one_half][one_half_last]
[/one_half_last]
My personal opinion of Justia’s website designs is that they leave much to be desired in terms of creativity and diversity. But that’s just one person’s opinion. There are clearly people who quite like the aesthetic of Justia’s websites given their success and longevity.
Besides design, we should also consider the technical qualities of Justia websites. For law firms who aspire to generate consistent leads from the web, website pagespeed is critical. At Juris Digital, we strive to ensure that our client’s site are not only elegant, unique, and highly functional, but also blazing fast.
Apparently, Justia values pagespeed too. I ran the four websites listed above through Google’s pagespeed tool, and the scores were impressive:
[one_half][/one_half][one_half_last][/one_half_last][one_half][/one_half][one_half_last][/one_half_last]
Kudos to Justia for prioritized pagespeed. This certainly puts their websites ahead of many of the other legal web design agencies in the field.
On Justia’s marketing website, they differentiate between websites and blogs (I’ll explain my opposition to this approach from a strategic standpoint below). It appears that Justia also uses different content management systems for their websites vs. blogs.
The best we can tell, Justia builds their client’s “websites” on a proprietary content management system (CMS). As we’ve discussed on this blog before, we always advise our clients to have their website built on WordPress. WordPress is the most commonly used CMS in the world, it’s the best suited for SEO and content marketing, and its easily transferrable.
And therein lies my issue with Justia using their own proprietary CMS for client websites. If you decide to move on from Justia, your new website provider will not be able to simply take over management of the site. You’ll have to build a new site on a platform that you or your new provider can manage.
Alternatively, it appears that Justia’s “blogs” are indeed built on WordPress. This does make sense; WordPress is an excellent platform for frequent publishing of new content. What doesn’t make a ton of sense, in my opinion, is using separate websites, and content management systems, for your firm’s “website” and “blog”.
In addition to offering law firm websites, Justia also offer law firm blogs. At Juris Digital, we don’t really make this distinction, because we build all of our client’s sites on WordPress, which accommodates both traditional “website” pages, and blogging.
Furthermore, we believe that blogging (ie. content marketing) is an essential part of any law firm’s digital marketing strategy. We bake blogs right into our client’s websites. Maintaining two separate websites, on two separate domains, means inefficiency, both from a management standpoint and from an SEO standpoint.
For example, if your blog gets a bunch of social media shares and natural backlinks, that’s great! But that SEO authority isn’t being equally applied to your separate “law firm website”. That site will require its own content and links in order to generate rankings and traffic.
While we have no doubt that Justia has produced effective blogs for their clients over the years, we strongly disagree with the approach of separating the firm’s website from the blog.
While I’m not a huge fan of their designs, or the fact that they use a proprietary CMS and domains for blogs vs. websites, I’d score Justia’s website’s a solid 4.5 our of 5 based on their strong calls-to-action, responsive coding, and fast page load times.
On the Content page on their marketing website, Justia says:
At Justia, we help our clients develop a sound content strategy that combines SEO best practices with each firm’s unique voice and approach to legal issues. We also offer custom content services for clients who prefer that their content be drafted by an experienced legal marketing professional.
Justia then goes on to list out the various attributes of their content services that makes them valuable. These include:
I am wholly unimpressed by Justia’s ability to describe the value of their content marketing services. This gives me pause and makes me wonder whether Justia has given any consideration to what’s required to succeed at legal content marketing in 2017 vs. 2004.
I invite you to compare Justia’s information on content marketing vs. our approach here at Juris Digital, by checking out our content marketing service page and our guide to evergreen content marketing.
In fairness, just because the person who wrote Justia’s content marketing services pages failed to convey much value, doesn’t mean that Justia isn’t capable of producing effective content for their clients. But it certainly doesn’t bode well. If Justia’s content capabilities are limited to producing content that addresses your practice areas and geographic market, that is properly formatted, that is unique, and that has “keyword density”, then you’re better off looking elsewhere for these services.
I gave Justia a 4.5 out of 5 for the quality of their websites. I can’t say the same for their content marketing services. Based on browsing through their client’s sites, and the information they have on their website, I’d give their content marketing services a 3 out of 5.
Effective SEO depends greatly on being proficient in a variety of areas of digital marketing. For example, effective SEO cannot be achieved in the absence of a technically sound website, or a thoughtful content and keyword strategy, or link building initiatives that deliver quality links.
In other words, providing effective SEO services is difficult because it requires that you have capabilities beyond a basic knowledge of how search engines work.
Justia’s SEO services page contains the same vague description of how they provide value with their SEO services as they used on the content marketing page. The various headings on the page cover:
It’s not that I necessarily object to the validity of any of these areas of focus, but I am again struck by the lack of value communicated. These are basic concepts that any qualified SEO understands. I encourage you to compare Justia’s explanation of their SEO services with ours.
What also strikes me here is the absence of a mention of link building. Justia does mention Distribution, which they define as:
Submitting your website to directories and databases may help your placement in search engine results pages.
While this is technically link building, it’s the absolute most basic form of link building, and it will not be enough to get your site ranked in competitive markets. At Juris Digital we are obsessed with link building because we understand that the ability to gain valuable backlinks is essential to achieving keyword rankings that generate new cases for our clients.
Again, just because the person who wrote Justia’s SEO services page failed to convey particularly compelling value, doesn’t mean that Justia isn’t capable of achieving SEO success, but it’s not a great sign.
We were recently approached by a Justia client who explained that he had been investing in marketing with Justia for nearly a decade. I was shocked when I analyze the site’s performance using AHrefs.com, and this is what I saw in terms of organic traffic:
AHrefs estimates that the site gets roughly 41 organic search visits per month. This is incredibly low for such an old site, and one that’s been “SEO’d” for nearly a decade. Compare that to Juris Digital’s oldest client:
The Justia client also has a blog with Justia, so I checked the performance of it as well, but the stats were far worse:
I realize that this example is anecdotal, and it certainly is not representative of all of Justia’s clients. But the fact that this client has been with them for so long, and still the site’s traffic is not more robust, is troubling.
I gave Justia a 4.5 out of 5 for the quality of their websites. But, like with their content marketing services, I have major doubts about their ability to provide aggressive and effective SEO services to their clients. I’d rate Justia’s SEO services the same as I do their content marketing: 3 out of 5.
Justia is a well established name in the online legal world, not only for their website and marketing services, but also for their lawyer directory and legal resources.
Based on my recent discussions with Justia clients, and my own examination of the site’s that they’re producing I can confidently say that law firms could do much worse in terms of digital marketing than Justia.
However, I sense that Justia’s history as one of the original online marketing companies for law firms has made them comfortable. I don’t see any special effort to keep up with what’s required for law firms to compete online in 2018, which is highlighted by issues like their lack of link building acumen and their vanilla content marketing services.
[juris_cta heading=”Considering hiring Justia for digital marketing?” content=”If you’re considering hiring Justia, we hope you’ll talk to us first to discuss our vision for generating new cases for your law firm online.” button=”Let’s Talk”]
So you’re ready to start your own law firm? Congratulations! This is the beginning of many a success story in the United States. Yours might be next. So you’re ready to start your own law firm? Congratulations! This is the beginning of many a success story in the United States. Yours might be next.
Mind you, not all law firms soar at first — or even ever. If they did, every attorney would have their own practice.
Starting your own law firm takes a lot of work and in this world of ethics rules and legal forms and bank accounts and insurance premiums and regulations… well, you get the idea. It isn’t easy. Or cheap. And there are no guarantees.
But the biggest stumbling block for shingle hangers is often simply the uncrossed “t” or the un-dotted “i.”
The things you forget about, overlook, or never even anticipate are the things most likely to cause you problems early on.
To that end, we’ve developed an everything-you-need-to-do list for lawyers opening their own practices.
We call it The Ultimate Starting Your Own Law Firm Checklist, and whether you’re a recent graduate or a seasoned vet venturing out of Big Law for the first time, it’s an excellent resource.
Below, we’ll walk you through the 13 most important areas of preparation. You’ll find a to-do list within each category. That’s a good thing because, as any Type-A personality can tell you (and if you’re hanging your own shingle, there’s a good chance you are one), crossing off a to-do list feels good.
“Planning” might seem like a pretty obvious item, but we aren’t talking about the abstract here. We mean a business plan… the same type of formal packet entrepreneurs must take to investors or the bank for a loan.
Even if you aren’t looking for that kind of capital just yet, it’s healthy to have a formal business plan in place for your firm. Too often, legal practices falter because the attorney only saw the firm as a vocation, not as a business.
As the head of your own practice, you’ll need to start wearing both hats from square one.
You need to have an idea of what your finances will look like, even if you expect them to be meager in the beginning. Know how much money you have to work with, where that money’s going, and when/where/how you’ll see it return.
You’ll probably need to adjust your Business Plan as you work through this step.
Attorneys usually have several options when forming a law firm as a business organization:
The right choice will depend on:
While it’s usually possible to change your form of business later, doing so is never not a pain, so think carefully now.
Do you have a ready-made client base? If you’ve been practicing for a long time at another law firm, the answer might be yes.
But many lawyers don’t have a bankable book of business to carry out the front door. In that case, you need to give real thought to how you’ll attract clients.
Remember: this is more difficult in law than in other professions. Strict rules apply when attorneys try to advertise themselves. Make sure you follow them.
Incidentally, this is one item on the law firm startup checklist that we can help with. Juris Digital is a top-ranked provider of web marketing for law firms, and we’re experts at using the internet to make law firms grow. However, if you would rather learn the ropes on your own or hire someone in-house to get a headstart on marketing, we recommend you check out our SEO Training Program for law firms. Your in-house marketer will appreciate it.
Obviously, it’s better to be in a busy part of town… but those spaces will cost you. If there’s a more affordable option outside of downtown, it might be worth considering.
Then again, some types of legal practices – like defense attorneys specializing in traffic tickets and low-level arrests — benefit tremendously from being near a courthouse. Medical malpractice attorneys might value proximity to hospitals.
These days, the virtual office is a popular option, as is the home office, but most lawyers find it easier to recruit clients when their shingle is both real and nonresidential. Here again, though, it’s all a question of cost.
The bottom line: real estate is a research-intensive inquiry, so plan on this part of the checklist taking some extra time.
If you’re starting a law firm, the state bar is going to want to know about it… and not just with an informal “by the way.” There are forms to fill out, rules to abide by, and (of course) fees to pay.
Don’t overlook any of those, or you’ll find yourself starting with your worst foot forward.
In fact, we recommend calling your state bar’s advisory board and asking them to walk you through the requirements. Make a note of the day, the time, the person you spoke with, and what they said.
As with everything else in law, managing your funds (and even more importantly, your clients’ funds) is something to take very seriously. You’ll need to have the right kinds of accounts and report on them regularly. You might also consider a line of credit.
As a general rule, your total capital account balance + your total line of available credit should be enough to cover all your startup costs and at least six months of overhead. (You’ll also need to have enough personal money to cover your bills and living expenses for the first six months to a year.)
Make sure you have access to an accountant you can trust. Just as importantly, make sure you’ll be able to communicate with that person regularly, smoothly, and securely.
You and your firm will need all kinds of insurance protection. Consider each of the following.
One of the best ways to avoid a malpractice suit is to do your due diligence before advising a client! But where will you do your research? And how?
LexisNexis and Westlaw aren’t the only subscriptions you might need. In addition to those and the accounting program we mentioned earlier, you might also want to consider:
For more guidance, be sure to consult our guide to the Top 10 Case Management software programs for lawyers.
Every office needs equipment, and a law firm is no exception. We’ve already written a guide to the best laptops for lawyers. But the computer’s only the first piece of the puzzle.
Don’t forget that just like any other business owner, you’ll be a boss too. As you know, there’s a lot of liability for employers, so think things through.
THE LAW FIRM EMPLOYER’S CHECKLIST
As Walt Disney once said, “The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing.” We hope this list helps you get that “doing” ball rolling. But don’t let it overwhelm you!
Remember: there is no one-size-fits-all approach to law firm management. Every startup is different, and there might be some boxes above that you simply don’t need to check. That’s okay.
Keep this in mind too: you don’t have to go it alone. If you want an experienced agency to help get your firm off the ground with an effective web marketing and SEO strategy, we can help. Contact Juris Digital and learn more about how we can help launch your new firm into success.
Wondering whether it’s time to fire your current SEO provider? Here we’ll look at five things to look for which may indicate that a change is in your best interest.
Ask your SEO the following questions and see what kind of answers you get:
If you hear a bunch of stuttering, “ers” and “uhs”, or attempting to “talk over your head” it’s probably because your SEO provider does not have a clear picture of what success looks like for your firm online. This indicates a lack of strategic foresight, and you’d be well served getting an outside set of eyes on your project.
If you’re paying your SEO company every month you ought to expect that they proactively monitor and QA your website to ensure that all is in order. That’s not to say that your site should be 100% error free, but there should not be any significant display or functionality issues.
You don’t need to be a technical expert to determine whether your website is technically sound. All you have to do is use your website. Navigate your site like a potential client would and look for issues:
If you find significant website display and functionality issues it may be a sign that your SEO company is not paying adequate attention to your project.
Back in “the day” many SEO agencies didn’t employ creatives like designers and copywriters because it wasn’t necessary. A webmaster with a fundamental knowledge of SEO could simply optimize the site, build some crappy links, and bam! The results would follow.
Modern SEO requires a broad set of capabilities.
If your SEO agency consistently delivers assets – infographics, articles, videos, landing pages, etc. – that don’t delight you, it could be because they have failed to hire the skilled personnel required to execute a successful modern SEO program. If your SEO provider’s deliverables don’t make you smile, it may be time to look elsewhere.
At Juris Digital we report to our SEO clients monthly. Our reports include the following details:
Key Performance Indicators:
Details of Monthly Work Completed
Agenda for Month Ahead
If your SEO company does not provide reports which clearly and transparently explain how your site is performing, what work has been completed, and what initiatives are on-deck, it’s probably because your project is being neglected, or because the agency does not have confidence in their strategy.
This one is a no-brainer. If your SEO company is willing to work with your competitors, you deserve better. I’m not saying that it’s impossible for a company to get results for two clients in the same market, but it’s a clear conflict and a sign that your firm’s long-term success is not their top priority.
Still have questions about when you should consider switching SEO companies? Please leave them in the comments below!
Wondering how long SEO will take to show results? The broad answer – which doesn’t apply in every circumstance, and should be taken with a grain of salt – is:
Around one (1) year. As little as 6 to 8 months, as long as 16 to 18 months.
The duration that you’ll need to invest in SEO before it begins to bear fruit is impacted by several factors. Here are the big ones:
Then again, even when all of these factors are known it’s still not possible to know exactly how long SEO will take to “work”. In general, I am comfortable using one year(ish) answer in almost all circumstances.
Total SEO project cost = $3,514.95
The site was launched on February 1, 2016. As you can see in the screenshot below, by February 2017, the site’s organic search traffic took a big leap forward:
In the same period we were able to achieve top three organic rankings for our primary target keywords:
As you can see, when the rankings and traffic hit, the site began producing leads:
I think most designers and business owners out there would agree that a logo is the most important part of any brand. Logos shouldn’t be difficult, hard to understand, pointless or create puzzles for the audience to decode. They should tell a story in a blink of an eye.
We can all probably name a handful of logos that we recognize, but what we don’t know is the time behind creating a logo. From idea, execution, to redesign, there are a lot of components that create a brand’s story.
Many believe that redesigning their logo is a quick and easy way to upgrade or freshen up their brand. In reality, it can be a risky proposition. Lets take the clothing store Gap for example.
In 2010 Gap released “a more contemporary, modern expression” of their logo said the store’s VP Bill Chandler. The logo release sent many loyal Gap customers into a Twitter and Facebook comment frenzy. The result was an immediate take down the new logo.
The famous redesign mistake:
Logo redesigns should not be taken lightly. If major corporations like the Gap can mess it up, so can you.
These questions will help organize your thoughts going into a meeting with a designer OR they will help you understand when and why you need to redesign your logo.
It’s critical that you take the time to understand what, if anything, are the good traits of your current logo. There might be something within that logo that works. This will make the process easier and create a smoother transition to the new logo.
You never want your logo to be complex. Remember, it has to make an impression in a blink of an eye. Overall, simplification in the logo makes it clearer and quicker to grasp your brand’s message.
For Example:
The colors are not what define your logo’s story or identity, but rather, the overall look and feel. Colors play a huge roll in the psychology of how the viewer feels towards your logo, and too many colors can add confusion, or bring the audience’s attention away from point you want to make.
For Example:
Sometimes you have elements or icons that have been so ingrained within your brand that you don’t want to part from them. So, no fear! The redesigned logo should respect those traditions. However, there is nothing wrong with modifying the colors, brush stroke, or icon to make it more modern or cleaner.
Take a look at these examples below:
The variety of available typefaces is almost endless. Sometimes with certain typefaces cause your message to get lost because they are difficult to read, which will cause viewers to disengage. Look for a way to minimize the complexity of your font to make it fully legible. In doing so, you find the balance between keeping the brand and showing your personality.
For Example:
This is the fun one in my opinion. Below are two examples of corporate logos, Fedex and Amazon. Fedex (if you haven’t noticed before) uses their negative space between the E and X to create a arrow. The arrow represents speed or movement.
The other example, Amazon, uses a “smile” to point to the A and Z representing that they deliver anything from a – z and their products will bring a smile to your face.
Incorporating messages like this reinforces a brand’s story and value propositions.
For Example:
What is a vector? According to Wikipedia: “Vector graphics files store the lines, shapes and colors that make up an image as mathematical formulae.” (a.k.a. EPS files)
What’s the purpose? Your logo has to be compatible online, offline, and everywhere in between. A vector image can be resized for all mediums including stationery, t-shirts, banners, and all other promotional materials.
There is no denying that Avvo is a huge website with massive visibility in Google and on TV. In fact, according to a recent SEM rush report I conducted, I found that they’re getting an estimated 1.3 million visits a month in Organic traffic. You can see how their monthly organic traffic has been growing pretty steadily over the past year in the graph below.
With that much search visibility, you may find yourself asking the question: “Are Avvo’s paid advertising services worth the investment?” Today we’re going to look at some real world data to see how effective it’s been for some of our legal clients.
To answer this question accurately it’s important we look at all sides of this story to get a full understanding of the benefits and detriments of Avvo’s paid services.
I usually tell my clients the first step in their journey should be to conduct a visibility study and determine if Avvo is ranking for keywords that are important to your business.
For us, we track important keywords through GetStat and simply run our whole keyword list through a ranking analysis in a metropolitan area. If we find that Avvo has enough visibility for our clients in that specific geographic area, then we can continue to the next step.
Right now it looks like Avvo is gaining prominence in a lot of searches and it seems they’re targeting “best” and “near me” queries with some of their optimization efforts.
You can see this in the SERP example below (the way they optimize their title tags)
In most cases, you will find that Avvo does have enough visibility to ensure you shouldn’t totally ignore it. You also can’t forget the ways you can show up on their website.
You can’t hide from AVVO in a lot of search results and there are a couple of different ways to show up on AVVO.
First and foremost you should know that AVVO attorney profiles are free listings. By being an attorney you can get a free profile and be a part of their internal database. This allows you to show up in their internal searches. This profile will also rank highly for attorney name searches in Google once you optimize your profile.
Here is an example of a free attorney name profile below:
But that is just one of the ways a profile will appear on the website. The page where a new client who did not previously know about you or your firm will likely find you on a search results page. Potential clients can find these ranking directly in Google or by doing a search on the Avvo.com website from any page.
The problem with the standard search pages is that there are no free listings above the fold. This means that a user would have to scroll to find you if you’re not paying for a pro listing.
To give you an idea of which listings are paid listings, I highlighted them in red in the example below.
You can see that there is heavy promotion for the paid listings and the free listings are dwarfed. The problem with this is that even if you have the highest attorney rating and someone sorts by rating you will show below the sponsored listings and premium profiles.
Your organic placement on Avvo depends on your overall rating numerical score from 1-10. Now let’s look at the different services they offer for paid placement.
Avvo offers a variety of services some of which are free and others which are paid.
The free options they offer include:
I always recommend maximizing your free exposure and thus I suggest you take advantage of a free profile and fully optimizing it. You should also focus on getting clients to leave reviews on your profile as a standard business practice. If you need help optimizing your profile, read my Avvo optimization guide here.
In addition to the free options, Avvo currently offers two paid services that are good for potentially generating more case leads.
The paid listing offers include:
Avvo pro is a paid subscription service by Avvo that can enhance your Avvo profile. According to Avvo it promotes the profile and gives consumers additional features to contact that specific attorney.
Some of the things the Pro designation allows you to do are:
In addition to this you are given a pro designation on your profile listing which may affect click through rate. We also saw earlier how having an Avvo Pro profile increases your overall visibility above the “free” members.
Below is an example of an Avvo Pro Listing with the Avvo Pro Badge (in blue)
Avvo advertising is a service they created specifically to help your profile gain more visibility within the Avvo.com website. Through this service, they offer paid advertising for those searching in your geographic areas and practice areas. Its similar to a Google Pay Per click in that sense but typically less expensive for attorney based searches.
Using the same example from the screenshot above you can see how these appear circled in red.
One thing to consider before you decide to advertise on Avvo is what your rating is and whether or not you have enough client reviews. Even if you pay to play you are still being compared to other attorneys.
The first case study we’re going to look at is a criminal defense attorney located in central California. This attorney advertised with Avvo for over 3 years starting with a basic pro listing and then upgrading to the sponsored listings in targeted geographic areas.
Over time it sounds like he has been tracking his Avvo performance pretty carefully and better than most attorneys I speak with. Currently, he has maxed out all of the advertising impressions in his area by blocks. Avvo sells the equivalent of listing impressions in blocks of 100.
Thankfully, he was kind enough to share some of his Avvo analytics data with me which you can see below:
I think it’s also worth noting that he does have a 10 Avvo rating as well. Looking at the data above you can see he had over 6,000 impressions during that recorded period. Those numbers seem big! But did it result in cases?
“On average, with current amount I pay, I get about 25 calls and another 25 website clicks per month. But sometimes these are the same person calling or visiting on multiple occasions (because AVVO tracking requires their own special phone number). Those provide ample opportunity to generate new business.I probably close about 5 per month straight from AVVO and the average fee per client is between $2500-$10,000. Some months a very slow and some fast.” – Nicco
Traffic looks cool, but if it doesn’t convert then it’s useless. Looking at the screenshots and data, I was able to confirm that he was getting about 25 phone calls and 25 website visits a month. You can see this in the screenshot below:
Although website visits can be great they differ from phone calls because they still have to contact you once they reach your website. This is why having goal tracking and analytics setup properly can play such a huge role in tracking your campaign success.
Overall, the math worked out like this. He spends about $2,000 per month to get around 6,000 profile views. Of that, it results in 50 contacts.
The Math Breakdown
The Avvo paid listing impressions have an overall conversion rate of about .0083%. This is based on the total “potential clients” metric Avvo provides which seems to count impressions from unique visitors.
This brings the total cost per case from Avvo to $400.
” I have been happy with AVVO but only as a piece to the puzzle. Ideally I would cut my blocks down in half and devote that other $1000 to some other form to further diversify but I can’t complain” – Nicco
Overall Nicco seems pretty happy with his Avvo paid services and it’s meeting his business goals. It would be interesting to re-evaluate the conversion rates by the impression channel. For example, if 25 conversions came from his profile views then that conversion rate would be very high.
If you get a higher conversion rate on another channel it may make sense to increase the investment there.
In this example, a Denver-based personal injury attorney was solicited by an Avvo outbound call team to sign up for their premium listings. This law firm has been advertising with Avvo for over a year using this service.
Here are the stats for a year of Avvo advertising with a Pro Listing:
Website Visits from Avvo: 100 ~ these are visitors who clicked from the AVVO profile to the client’s website.
Email Contacts from Avvo: 5 ~ these are emails sent via Avvo.com to the client
Calls Generated: 7 ~ these are calls tracked from the Avvo Call Tracking number.
Cases Signed: 1
The data below is over the past 30 days and was pulled from Avvo’s back end analytics. It is just tracking the actual contacts and not the visits.
Analysis Of Efforts:
In this example, you have to remember you get what you pay for. At $100 a month, it would have been worth it for this client if they signed at least one case, which they did do.
While the ROI worked out for them in this case you can see that it’s probably not effective for someone who wants a quality volume approach. There is also no way to separate which of these visits were “free” visits vs. which ones were paid visits which can make a big impact.
There is also no saying that consumers didn’t find the attorneys profile via a free search and then click through to the clients website. One of the frustrating things is that they do in fact show profile visibility history for the past 30 day date range but it does not show which channels resulted in the contacts. I suspect this is on purpose and you can see this in the example below:
Since Avvo hides some of this data it’s difficult to say how effective ads are being vs the free profile listing. This is something to consider when deciding whether or not to purchase paid ads from them.
I interviewed seven other attorneys who have used Avvo’s paid services over the years and it seems that there results were pretty typical of what I have seen.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Location: Fresno, CA
Nico, an attorney from Fresno, California seemed to have the biggest wins I heard about during my interviews. According to Nico,
“I have used (paid) AVVO for a couple years now. I started with just the simple pro plan but as my business grew I expanded with block/sponsored paid listings. The cost was prohibitive at first but now it is an integral part of my attempt at diverse marketing. Fact is, whether us lawyers like it or not, people gravitate towards directories like AVVO because of the review system. AVVO reviews are a whole other conversation but consumers really do look at them. I have gotten far more business from “I found you online and liked your reviews” than “I spoke with so and so and they said I should call.” It is the modern approach that my firm strives for because modern clients care about that stuff.” – Nico
Practice Area: Family Law
Location: Chicago
Joshua, who is a family law attorney from the Law Offices of Joshua E Stern told me that he advertised with Avvo for 5 months but it was hard to track the ROI. In his words,
“Avvo was cheap. I paid $120 per month for “3 blocks of 100 searches.” I currently pay very little for advertising. I’m starting an SEM campaign, but I am a firm believer in content marketing. Avvo, like Yelp, Findlaw, etc., have poor metrics for calculating ROI and most internet users rely more on Google than third party sites to do research on their legal issue/representation.” – Joshua
Practice Area: Probate & Estate Planning
Location: Florida
I spoke briefly with an attorney named Jon who does probate and estate planning in Florida. He wished to remain anonymous. He signed up for three months using their promotional rate at about $100 per month but did not receive any leads from this.
Practice Area: Employment Law
Location: Orange County
Branigan, another attorney I interviewed who was an Orange County employment lawyer told me he advertised with Avvo for over 12 months. After spending almost $2,000 he received between 6 and 12 phone calls but none of them turned into a case. To put his experience in his own words,
“When you compare those numbers with what my website produces, it was a complete waste of money. But hey… you live and you learn.” – Branigan
Practice Area: Corporate Transactions
Location: NYC
The firm Peter works at, Scarinci Hollenbeck, is a bigger firm with a lot of attorneys and multiple locations. Over the years they have tried Avvo with several different attorneys at various lengths. During their trials, they also did not sign any cases they were able to attribute to the Avvo.com listing.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Location: Dallas
Paul from the Saputo Law Firm has been advertising with them for over a year at around the $100 price point. During this time he has not been able to attribute any cases to Avvo although it did seem it may not be tracked fully.
Practice Area: Federal Trademark
Location: Tri-State Area
Patrick from Pesochinsky Law Firm LLC. shared his experience with me as well. According to Patrick
“I used Avvo.com for 2 months. It was roughly $250 a month, but it was unsuccessful and did not bring in any new business. I ended up requesting a refund.”. – Patrick
Practice Area: Criminal
Location: New York City
Todd from the Spodek Law Firm seems to be happy with his overall results when considering the aggregate approach.
“I have been advertising with AVVO for a number of years and currently have about $3,000 monthly spend with them. I find that the I receive 5-10 leads via AVVO over a month. However, I find that it’s the aggregate advertising technique that seems to work best for me. For example, a client may find me on AVVO and then search online, and check Yelp, etc. However, my SEO guy says it’s not worth it and I should just be doing local SEO and Yelp.” – Todd
Paying for ads from a service like Avvo can be a tempting proposition to sign more cases. Over the years I have worked with a lot of attorneys who have tried Avvo and sadly their results were typically less than subpar.
However, those attorneys who invest in reviews and getting a 10.0 score do seem to perform a bit better. At the end of the day, you have to determine if Avvo is a good opportunity for you to try. To make the best decision I recommend looking at your ROI. If $1,200 a year ($100 a month) will get you one case in that year that would mean you have a $1,200 cost per case! That’s a large investment!
On the other hand, what can you use that money for that will do better? Typically we recommend content marketing and link building initiatives but every firm is different. The fact remains though that if you can’t track what sources your cases are coming from, you have more groundwork to do.
Although I’m not a fan of Avvo for many reasons, I will also say that you should never consider ignoring it.
No matter who you are you should use Avvo to sign more cases for your firm and know that you can do that using their free services by putting your attention towards the right things. If you’re still considering Avvo paid ads you should enter into a limited time campaign with proper goal tracking setup and evaluate the campaign after a certain period. Since the ads start showing immediately you can run it for 30 days and see if it’s a good fit for your business.
Here are some things you should do with Avvo no matter what.
I hope you found this article useful and informative. What has your experience been using Avvo’s paid services? Please leave your feedback in the comments below. We’re interested to hear what you’ve been through!
YouTube and Attorneys are a match made in heaven. Years ago, you had to be lucky enough to catch a crazy attorney ads on TV. YouTube changed that. Now attorneys post and promote their ads via the platform on a regular basis.
Regrettably, the vast majority of the ads on YouTube are just plain bad. You know the type of legal ad I’m talking about, too. They usually aired during daytime TV, had a stiff attorney in a suit talking about ‘justice’ or droning on about some type of legal case. Boring.
And really, who wants to rank or share these ads? Not me. Instead, I’d rather explore the ads that make me laugh – even if they aren’t technically ‘good.’ That’s why we’re sharing the “Best of the Worst.” From a technical aspect, these ads are no feat in filmmaking. Dated effects (but they have effects!) permeate the videos. The acting is….well….not good. But they are a whole lot of fun.
Without further delay, it’s time to jump into the list. One quick note though – I am definitely aware that most of these attorneys are from Texas. There seems to be something about the Lone Star State that inspires attorneys to compete for viral videos.
On top of the hilarious videos compiled in 2017 – we’ve got a couple new nominees for “Best of the Worst” Attorney ads!
Honestly, I can’t believe we missed this one last time. With a slogan like “Turn your pain into rain” there was no way we were leaving it off this year.
If you’re going through tough times and need to file for bankruptcy, Denvil Crowe has you covered. Add some off-key vocals and a cheesy tune in the background and you’ve got Attorney Ad Gold.
These guys are serious (I think). Jim Adler and son Bill Adler have both adopted the moniker “The Texas Hammer.” Don’t deal with the insurance company on your own, let them get hammered.
Surprise! We’re back in Texas. Pete Reid is an Austin business lawyer, but he is also apparently a pro soccer player, a chess master, some type of martial artist, a crimefighter, and much more. I’m not sure what any of this has to do with business litigation, but it makes for a good YouTube video!
You know you’ve made it when Danny Trejo is down to do your commercial. You also know that almost anything with Danny Trejo is gold. Enjoy this one.
OK – this one is pretty old, but the YouTube upload is from last year. And it’s too great to leave off the list. This ad has everything. Pristine delivery? Check. Vicious bluntness? Check. At least five great insults? Check. Seriously, don’t miss this one.
This Alabama attorney spared no expense for his latest commercial. If things get too contentious, it appears he’ll knock out the insurance company and send cash flying everywhere. Also, I wonder how many “state name + hammer” nicknames are out there?
I saved the best for last. The Texas Law Hawk is the Michael Bay of attorney advertising. Special effects? He’s got ’em. Flame throwers? Those too. Frankly, I’d hire the guy strictly based on his willingness to make hilariously over the top commercials. His latest is a Christmas Special, featuring Santa Claus of course.
Legal marketing is not easy. We’re poking fun, but we appreciate the effort and creativity that went into making these commercials. If you’ve seen any “best of the worst” type commercials, we’d love for you to share in the comments below!